Asrock H61M-DGS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61M-DGS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 12 '23 at 21:02
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 155
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 254
31% 237 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2012 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Lighting 38.2
Reflection 43.5
Parallax 44.3
31% 42 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 29.4
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 214 76 53 180 162 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.3% Average
Read 236
Write 213
Mixed 162
SusWrite 140
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 17.9
65% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 38.9
DQ Mixed 44.6
41% 64.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-050.A00LF 12GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 94
43% 94 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback