MSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics188% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B18
MotherboardMSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18)  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221102
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 12 '23 at 18:06
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$429
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 285
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 913
86% 714 Pts
64-Core 1,365
84% 1,365 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
Palit(1569 2216) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4975 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
188% Outstanding
Lighting 274
Reflection 250
Parallax 280
223% 268 fps
MRender 311
Gravity 225
Splatting 169
185% 235 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 188%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM13.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,051
Write 1,039
Mixed 353
180% 814 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 38.7
164% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 431
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 750
464% 511 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 223%
Adroitlark 480GB 480GB
422GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 482
Write 454
Mixed 426
101% 454 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 53.1
170% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 141
166% 288 MB/s
Poor: 85% Great: 126%
Adroitlark 480GB 480GB
426GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 455
Write 453
Mixed 405
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 54.2
174% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 141
166% 287 MB/s
Poor: 85% Great: 126%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
383GB free
Firmware: SBFKZ1.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 284
Write 406
Mixed 297
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 35.7
126% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 170
150% 219 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 102%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
74GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 242
Write 101
Mixed 126
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 20.9
88% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 139
114% 158 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
401GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 170
Write 159
Mixed 92.2
104% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 104%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
24GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.3
Write 18.2
Mixed 14.2
26% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1.6
85% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 27.6
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 40.5
SC Mixed 24.6
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18) Builds (Compare 7,354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18) - $145

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $743
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback