Packard Easynote TE69CXP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPackard Easynote TE69CXP  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EA50_CX
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '23 at 17:30
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3217U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
40% Average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 37.5
2-Core 77.8
38% 59.6 Pts
4-Core 97.6
8-Core 105
13% 102 Pts
64-Core 106
6% 106 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0835) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.91% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.6
3% 2.63 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.91%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$86
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 164 167 185 175 187 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 432
Write 398
Mixed 307
SusWrite 181
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 21.6
64% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 183
140% 190 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT325S6EFR8A-PB Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 9.3
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Easynote TE69CXP Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard Easynote TE69CXP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $86
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback