HP 250 G5 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 250 G5 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81EC
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160801
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJul 12 '23 at 14:22
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 129
58% 94.4 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 191
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 81EC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.73% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 0.2
4% 3.73 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9.2
6% 7.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.73%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMKB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 46 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 351
Write 368
Mixed 303
SusWrite 62.1
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 25.6
92% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 132
115% 167 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB Kingston 9905711-016.A00G 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.2% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 250 G5 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G5 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback