Asrock X370 Killer SLI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Killer SLI  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '17 at 02:15
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 74.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 251
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 816
80% 658 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Asus(1043 054B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1197 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Lighting 27.3
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 34.9
22% 31.1 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 26.1
Splatting 31.1
24% 28.6 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD Smartbuy 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.1% Above average
Read 247
Write 280
Mixed 231
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 10.4
83% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 15.7
37% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 91%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
603GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 96.6
Write 89.8
Mixed 90.8
70% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.31
85% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R748G2133U2S 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 27.9
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 25.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Killer SLI Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Killer SLI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $614
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback