MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics87.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive309% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230306
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 12 '23 at 00:37
Run Duration298 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 88.6
1-Core 172
2-Core 332
106% 198 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 1,017
99% 815 Pts
64-Core 1,378
85% 1,378 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Nvidia(10DE 12FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.8% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 101
Parallax 105
90% 106 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 94.7
Splatting 87.4
83% 104 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1200 796 751 748 739 725 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
309% Outstanding
Read 2,488
Write 2,521
Mixed 2,372
SusWrite 827
461% 2,052 MB/s
4K Read 73.1
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 96.4
329% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,347
DQ Write 1,202
DQ Mixed 1,275
956% 1,275 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 309%
Great: 410%
Patriot Singe 240GB
146GB free
Firmware: Q0207A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 244 244 244 245 245 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 500
Write 243
Mixed 257
SusWrite 244
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 32.1
130% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 173
142% 200 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 83%
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
199GB free
Firmware: RKT303.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1174 468 461 411 400 419 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,346
Write 2,268
Mixed 1,415
SusWrite 556
316% 1,396 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 77.5
267% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 744
DQ Write 1,116
DQ Mixed 328
417% 729 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 212%
Great: 277%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
629GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 159 159 158 160 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 144
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 158
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
127GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 95 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 67.3
Write 65.7
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 94.6
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 32.6
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 29.7
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 30.5
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $905
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback