Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '17 at 00:06
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 827
79% 652 Pts
64-Core 1,241
77% 1,241 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 150
Parallax 129
113% 139 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 138
Splatting 113
100% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$100
889GB free
Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 499
Write 344
Mixed 325
86% 389 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 17.4
96% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 31.2
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 32.7
42% 71.3 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 107%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 1,547
Write 514
Mixed 527
187% 863 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 18.2
100% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 45.2
67% 128 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 130%
Great: 155%
Zotac Sonix NVMe PCIe 480GB-$797
251GB free
Firmware: E7FM02.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 2,493
Write 1,384
Mixed 1,670
408% 1,849 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 41.4
142% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 119
123% 200 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 239%
Great: 244%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$65
222GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 483
Write 194
Mixed 268
69% 315 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 18
93% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 51.3
74% 135 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 84%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
68GB free
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 467
Write 331
Mixed 323
83% 374 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 18.8
95% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 48.3
73% 139 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
575GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 118
Write 112
Mixed 109
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.52
120% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89% Excellent
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 32.1
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 24.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 50.7
79% 50.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 2,002 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $748
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback