TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Avell B.ON

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAvell B.ON  (all builds)
MotherboardAvell B.ON
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '23 at 20:19
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 68.4
1-Core 142
2-Core 206
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 507
57% 449 Pts
64-Core 544
34% 544 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 69.7%
 Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Clevo(1558 4050) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 19.7
Parallax 21.1
15% 19.6 fps
MRender 17
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 15.1
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 14.8%
 Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IM2P33F8ABR1-512GB 512GB
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103B0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 971 1013 714 858 775 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,414
Write 1,369
Mixed 898
SusWrite 791
251% 1,118 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 23.9
195% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 716
DQ Write 893
DQ Mixed 456
441% 688 MB/s
Poor: 117% ↑
This bench: 196%
 Great: 252%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
142GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 96 98 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 138
Write 110
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 97.1
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.8
198% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 67.6%
 Great: 79%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 34 38 38 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 28.4
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 36.6
22% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 18.5%
 Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD4S320038G22-BHYD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 26.4
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 17.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 81.8%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B.ON Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Avell B.ON

CPU
Core i7-1165G7IntelBench 66%, 51,565 samples10x
Core i5-1135G7IntelBench 69%, 36,962 samples4x
Core i7-1255UIntelBench 65%, 11,564 samples3x
GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples13x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 13%, 18,007 samples4x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples1x
SSD
IM2P33F8A-512GD 512GBBench 186%, 131 samples6x
IM2P33F8ABR1-512GB 512GBBench 181%, 86 samples2x
IM2P33F8BR2-1TB 1TBBench 192%, 247 samples2x
RAM
53E1G32D4NQ-046 2x2GBMicronBench 123%, 77 samples6x
AD4S320038G22-BHYD 2x8GBAdataBench 89%, 372 samples5x
53E1G32D4NQ-046 8x2GBMicronBench 117%, 527 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback