TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Pro Mini 400 G9 Desktop PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Pro Mini 400 G9 Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8955
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '23 at 19:47
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i5-12500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 81
1-Core 167
2-Core 292
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 834
79% 653 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 84.5%
 Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
HP(103C 8955) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4274
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
7.89% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 10.4
7% 11 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 10
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 7.89%
 Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA256TFK-1BC1AABHA 256GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPSV040
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,261
Write 1,666
Mixed 1,136
304% 1,354 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 50.4
179% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 833
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 667
475% 619 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 257%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S8MR-8 9905700-118.A00G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 35.7
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 28.7
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 98% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Pro Mini 400 G9 Desktop PC Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro Mini 400 G9 Desktop PC

CPU
Gen Intel Core i5-12500T12thBench 83%, 894 samples78x
Gen Intel Core i7-12700T12thBench 93%, 637 samples32x
Gen Intel Core i3-12100T12thBench 80%, 181 samples11x
GPU
UHD Graphics 770IntelBench 7%, 2,512 samples78x
UHD Graphics 770IntelBench 8%, 19,750 samples35x
UHD Graphics 730IntelBench 6%, 14,644 samples12x
SSD
KIOXIA 512GBKbg50znv512gBench 170%, 1,846 samples14x
MZVLQ512HBLU-00BH1 512GBSamsungBench 130%, 3,023 samples13x
CL4-8D256-HP 256GBSsstcBench 125%, 104 samples12x
RAM
HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 4,293 samples14x
M471A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 46%, 7,758 samples14x
HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN 1x16GBHynixBench 41%, 2,427 samples11x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback