Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211001
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateJul 11 '23 at 19:18
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 118
2-Core 228
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 715
70% 574 Pts
64-Core 1,137
70% 1,137 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 177
Parallax 185
140% 178 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 159
Splatting 134
130% 163 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$95
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,529
Write 1,525
Mixed 1,175
314% 1,410 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 52.9
185% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 968
DQ Write 743
DQ Mixed 820
623% 844 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 237%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
92GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 344 242 253 253 242 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 428
Mixed 376
SusWrite 290
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 46.6
153% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 206
155% 207 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 134%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
803GB free
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 62 292 314 63 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 475
Write 390
Mixed 384
SusWrite 143
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 20
104% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 1
46% 108 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 100%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
152GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 177 82 81 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 415
Write 90.5
Mixed 124
SusWrite 97.2
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 22.5
92% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 88
DQ Mixed 103
84% 123 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 121%
Synology iSCSI Storage 859GB
66GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 96 95 95 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 98.7
Write 95.3
Mixed 99.7
SusWrite 95.3
22% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 10.1
34% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 162
107% 127 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 25%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 206 206 204 208 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 142
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 205
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 117%
Great: 114%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
2TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 170 191 166 170 192 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 111
Write 89.3
Mixed 66
SusWrite 173
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 2.7
457% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 37.2
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 32.3
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 103%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 2,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback