Asus B85-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus B85-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150427
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '23 at 11:33
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User MNG-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 161
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 328
40% 304 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 20.6
17% 19.9 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 17
17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 156 116 126 124 114 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.8% Good
Read 246
Write 213
Mixed 216
SusWrite 138
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 39.1
128% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 187
141% 189 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 115%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 322GB
65GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 20 21 20 22 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 19.9
54% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 95%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 322GB
153GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 18 16 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 90.5
Write 98
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 17.3
50% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 95%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 161GB
86GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 18 17 18 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 121
Write 104
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 17.4
56% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 83%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 161GB
85GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 18 15 16 17 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 100
Write 98.1
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 17.2
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.9% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 7.5
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 1,322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus B85-PRO GAMER - $504

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $924
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback