MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '23 at 04:54
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 222
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 595
61% 493 Pts
64-Core 860
53% 860 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2312) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12027.9001
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.9% Average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 79.1
50% 66.5 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 65.1
Splatting 43.6
45% 56.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful CN600S 256GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0318B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 290 278 79 109 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 1,312
Write 853
Mixed 816
SusWrite 185
175% 791 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 9.3
122% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 64.2
DQ Mixed 272
185% 234 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 107%
Great: 159%
Semsotai 480GB 480GB
118GB free
Firmware: S0918A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 17 18 18 33 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 459
Write 392
Mixed 354
SusWrite 86.3
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 0.4
16% 40.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 90%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
220GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 137
Write 73.9
Mixed 58.6
101% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.3
113% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.2
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback