Acer Aspire E5-575G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170303
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateNov 07 '21 at 15:11
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 171
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 267
35% 262 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1094) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.51% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 11
Parallax 7.1
5% 8.13 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.51%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful CN600S 256GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0318B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 123 183 177 209 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 955
Write 182
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 172
75% 350 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 13.5
93% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 68.2
106% 199 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 159%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
786GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 123 123 123 123 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 78.8
Write 105
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 122
66% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
182% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-058.A00G 04CB AO1P21FC4R1-B2MS 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.1% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.4
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-575G Builds (Compare 3,096 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback