Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V DDR3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemGigabyte H110M-DS2V DDR3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V DDR3-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '23 at 01:48
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 103
58% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 342
48% 353 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
PwrHis(1787 D570) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1264 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47% Average
Lighting 60.6
Reflection 56.8
Parallax 77
49% 64.8 fps
MRender 57.5
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 42.6
42% 53.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OVATION 128GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220303a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 289 296 324 325 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 312
Write 279
Mixed 295
SusWrite 282
66% 292 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 43.9
131% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 316
235% 305 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.6% Poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-DS2V DDR3-CF Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V DDR3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback