TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ProDesk 400 G3 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8062
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '23 at 20:24
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 223
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 558
60% 475 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 81.3%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Zotac(19DA 1438)
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.1% Good
Lighting 75.6
Reflection 76.4
Parallax 78.3
62% 76.8 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 69.3
57% 69.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 60.1%
 Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
878GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2704M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 238 76 72 145 147 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 1% Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0xEF04] TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 20.7
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 20.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 69.2%
 Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ProDesk 400 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G3 SFF

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel  $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples440x
Core i7-6700Intel  $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples141x
Core i3-6100Intel  $51Bench 55%, 110,166 samples133x
GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples484x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples41x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples28x
SSD
MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 73%, 5,673 samples45x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples34x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples31x
RAM
M378A5143DB0-CPB 1x4GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,600 samples34x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples34x
M378A5143DB0-CPB 2x4GBSamsungBench 69%, 2,652 samples33x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback