TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME X670-P WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 174%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics255% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X670-P WIFI  (all builds)
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '23 at 12:14
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$259
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 161
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 572
54% 446 Pts
64-Core 819
51% 819 Pts
Poor: 105% ↑
This bench: 68.7%
 Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
MSI(1462 5103)
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
255% Outstanding
Lighting 315
Reflection 439
Parallax 755
257% 503 fps
MRender 526
Gravity 566
Splatting 303
364% 465 fps
Poor: 303% ↑
This bench: 255%
 Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2055 2498 2857 3024 2958 2808 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 1457
Write 2,804
Mixed 2,108
SusWrite 2,700
517% 2,267 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 58.6
184% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 724
DQ Write 576
DQ Mixed 695
508% 665 MB/s
Poor: 237% ↑
This bench: 310%
 Great: 587%
WD WD64PURZ-85BWUY0 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 178 181 179 180 181 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 38.7
Write 150
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 179
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
207% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 62.9%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3040G322x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
164% Outstanding
MC Read 76.4
MC Write 54.4
MC Mixed 60.6
182% 63.8 GB/s
SC Read 35.2
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 40.9
101% 35.3 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 149% ↑
This bench: 164%
 Great: 257%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME X670-P WIFI Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 289%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 294%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X670-P WIFI

CPU
Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD  $259Bench 117%, 4,385 samples30x
Ryzen 7 7700XAMD  $234Bench 112%, 4,548 samples19x
Ryzen 9 7900XAMD  $320Bench 113%, 4,545 samples17x
GPU
RX 7900-XTXAMD  $1,000Bench 257%, 5,548 samples12x
RTX 4070-TiNvidia  $773Bench 240%, 46,082 samples11x
RTX 4080Nvidia  $970Bench 290%, 22,998 samples10x
SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples10x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung  $170Bench 416%, 138,083 samples9x
SKC3000D2048G 2TBKingstonBench 458%, 10,369 samples9x
RAM
KF560C36-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 178%, 10,381 samples7x
CMH32GX5M2B5600C36 2x16GBCorsairBench 164%, 3,792 samples6x
Vengeance LPX 5600 C36 2x16GBCorsairBench 162%, 23,486 samples5x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback