Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '23 at 01:09
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 69.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 271
85% 159 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 802
82% 663 Pts
64-Core 995
62% 995 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600
XFX(1EAE 7601) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.7.1
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 180
Parallax 284
122% 205 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 184
Splatting 212
163% 197 fps
Poor: 56%
This bench: 129%
Great: 135%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
774GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1517 1603 1296 1692 1752 1745 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 102% Great: 394%
Amd-raid WDC WD60EDAZ-11B 6TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 78 92 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 160
Write 171
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 90.1
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 0.3
443% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3200C16K2E CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 CM4X8GD3200C16K2E CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69% Good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 27.4
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 26.8
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback