Asus Pro Q670M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 169%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive421% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro Q670M-C  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '23 at 17:32
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700KF-$218
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 79.2
1-Core 205
2-Core 409
119% 231 Pts
4-Core 808
8-Core 1,502
138% 1,155 Pts
64-Core 2,357
146% 2,357 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 115%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Gigabyte(1458 4060) ≥ 4GB; Gigabyte rtx 3060 ti 8gb
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 177
Parallax 182
148% 180 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 138
Splatting 119
118% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3SSD8 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2446 2679 2674 2690 2719 2723 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
421% Outstanding
Read 1,978
Write 2,543
Mixed 2,138
SusWrite 2,655
528% 2,329 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 277
4K Mixed 102
371% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 1,714
DQ Write 1257
DQ Mixed 1,496
1,115% 1,489 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 421%
Great: 417%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C40-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 65.4
MC Write 63.5
MC Mixed 58.6
179% 62.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 50.3
SC Mixed 28.4
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 160%
Great: 171%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro Q670M-C Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro Q670M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback