Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S1  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '17 at 11:12
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3330 CPU @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 175
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 334
45% 334 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 60.1
56% 65.8 fps
MRender 73.8
Gravity 65.9
Splatting 69.6
57% 69.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.6% Poor
Read 245
Write 48.4
Mixed 65.4
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 2.44
4K Mixed 2.44
32% 7.72 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 71%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA331 1TB
717GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3NH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 128
Write 135
Mixed 125
97% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.41
97% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown OP 135700 03/15 2M 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
33.5% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-S1 Builds (Compare 2,458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback