Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 177%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 212%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics177% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory119.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '23 at 17:25
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 75.3
1-Core 170
2-Core 339
102% 195 Pts
4-Core 673
8-Core 1,254
115% 964 Pts
64-Core 2,650
164% 2,650 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
Gigabyte(1458 232B) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Lighting 210
Reflection 246
Parallax 424
171% 293 fps
MRender 400
Gravity 168
Splatting 322
243% 297 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 177%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1935 948 956 958 941 911 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2440
Write 3711
Mixed 2,326
SusWrite 1,108
541% 2,396 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 89.2
306% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,423
DQ Write 1,289
DQ Mixed 1,308
994% 1,340 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 321%
Great: 491%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
318GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 435 435 437 435 434 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 433
Mixed 420
SusWrite 435
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 54.4
172% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 199
154% 212 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 110%
Great: 125%
WDC WUH721816ALE6L4 16TB
8TB free
Firmware: PCGNW232
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 243 240 244 233 239 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.6% Below average
Read 204
Write 207
Mixed 132
SusWrite 240
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 0.5
29% 9.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 4.6
DQ Mixed 5.2
3% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 65%
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
201GB free
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1505 646 128 127 1004 367 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,092
Write 1,474
Mixed 1,359
SusWrite 630
309% 1,389 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 50.5
239% 96.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,153
DQ Write 998
DQ Mixed 667
612% 939 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 241%
Great: 394%
Seagate ST4000VM000-1F3168 4TB
201GB free
Firmware: SC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 87 88 88 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 119
Write 113
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 87.1
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST4000VM000-1F3168 4TB
481GB free
Firmware: SC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 137 140 137 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 106
Write 100
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 139
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST4000VM000-1F3168 4TB
167GB free
Firmware: SC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 144 143 145 144 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 87.9
Write 74.7
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 144
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3600 C20 Series 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 51.3
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 39.1
125% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 39.7
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback