Asus F1A55-M LX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 4% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus F1A55-M LX (all builds)
Memory	0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111212
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '23 at 14:36
Run Duration	310 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80 2,796 User benchmarks, average bench 36% FM1 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	6.37% Terrible	Memory 3.84 1-Core 29.8 2-Core 41.4 13% 25 Pts	4-Core 49.8 8-Core 57.2 7% 53.5 Pts	64-Core 74.6 5% 74.6 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 6.37% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D 3,128 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	1.52% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 2.3 1% 2.03 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 2 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.52% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30 12,971 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 237GB free (System drive) Firmware: SD22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 84 79 39 49 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 30.4 Write 89.1 Mixed 50.1 SusWrite 66.5 44% 59 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.3 70% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 65%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 8GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 4 3.7 2 2.8 2.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Read 5.2 Write 3.7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 3 5% 4.02 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F2G64CB88G7N-CG 1x2GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.96% Terrible	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.07 GB/s	SC Read 0.7 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 0.4 2% 0.87 GB/s	Latency 465 9% 465 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 7.96% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A55-M LX Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LX

CPU
A6-3500 APUAMD $60Bench 39%, 2,804 samples	5x
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	5x
Athlon II X4 631AMDBench 46%, 1,364 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	2x
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	2x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	2x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
SATA SSD 480GBKioxia-exceriaBench 78%, 7,893 samples	2x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	1x

RAM
FLGF65F-C8KL9A 8GBKingmaxBench 44%, 24 samples	3x
V01D3LF4GB26826813 8GBUnknownBench 41%, 111 samples	2x
99U5474-010.A00LF 4GBKingstonBench 38%, 73 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $112

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16