Asus F1A55-M LX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics1.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F1A55-M LX  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '23 at 19:31
Run Duration328 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80
FM1 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 23.4
2-Core 35.7
14% 29.5 Pts
4-Core 36.1
8-Core 45.4
5% 40.8 Pts
64-Core 47.6
3% 47.6 Pts
Poor: 24% Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D
Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
1.56% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1.9
2% 1.93 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.56%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SD22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 5.9 9.6 6.5 4.5 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 101
Write 13.5
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 6.7
28% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F2G64CB88G7N-CG 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.56% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.93 GB/s
SC Read 0.7
SC Write 1.4
SC Mixed 0.5
2% 0.87 GB/s
Latency 553
7% 553 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.56%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A55-M LX Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $112
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback