Asrock 960GC-GS FX

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 960GC-GS FX (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150723
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '23 at 13:27
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Opteron 3350 HE 14 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Memory 77.5 1-Core 48.2 2-Core 84.5 46% 70.1 Pts	4-Core 118 8-Core 128 16% 123 Pts	64-Core 121 8% 121 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Dell(1028 3492) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 536.40 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (66 fps cap detected)	53.4% Above average	Lighting 66 Reflection 66.5 Parallax 61.7 54% 64.7 fps	MRender 67 Gravity 66.2 Splatting 61.4 53% 64.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 238GB 1,346 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 203 72 15 32 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	42% Average	Read 385 Write 260 Mixed 189 SusWrite 87.1 51% 230 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 26.3 4K Mixed 12.7 54% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 90.3 DQ Mixed 58.4 58% 94.7 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 102%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 230GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 161 202 205 226 224 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.4% Good	Read 237 Write 212 Mixed 211 SusWrite 195 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 46.5 4K Mixed 34.6 112% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 135 100% 132 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1866, 1866 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	41.4% Average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 14.8 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 11.6 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 85.3 47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 960GC-GS FX Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 960GC-GS FX - $122

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	30x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	13x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
T253X1120G 120GBTeamBench 65%, 1,708 samples	5x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	4x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	43x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	32x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $240

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16