Asrock 960GC-GS FX

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 960GC-GS FX (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150723
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '23 at 13:45
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	90%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Opteron 3350 HE 14 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Memory 74.1 1-Core 37.5 2-Core 75.2 42% 62.3 Pts	4-Core 102 8-Core 116 14% 109 Pts	64-Core 116 7% 116 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Dell(1028 3492) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 536.40 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (66 fps cap detected)	53.3% Above average	Lighting 65.7 Reflection 66.5 Parallax 59.3 54% 63.8 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 66.4 Splatting 61.4 53% 65 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 230GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 131 171 197 219 226 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.4% Above average	Read 215 Write 190 Mixed 186 SusWrite 183 44% 193 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 30.6 99% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 122 92% 124 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 124%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 238GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 146 81 77 54 61 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 263 Write 119 Mixed 153 SusWrite 97.3 118% 158 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 10.7 1,743% 9.03 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 211%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	34% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 11.7 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 9.8 24% 8.37 GB/s	Latency 92.2 43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 960GC-GS FX Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 960GC-GS FX - $122

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	30x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	13x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
T253X1120G 120GBTeamBench 65%, 1,708 samples	5x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	4x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	43x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	32x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $240

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16