Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJul 06 '23 at 05:48
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 74
1-Core 102
2-Core 227
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 395
51% 383 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 20.7
12% 16.3 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 17.5
Splatting 13.8
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 61 16 36 103 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 448
Write 350
Mixed 340
SusWrite 84.5
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 19.1
78% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 70.2
DQ Mixed 43.2
46% 76.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 55%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
904GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 188 186 188 187 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 174
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 188
104% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FL2400D4U17-8G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 13.5
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback