MSI MS-17M1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive278% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GS76 Stealth 11UG
MotherboardMSI MS-17M1  (all builds)
Memory56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '23 at 02:47
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 214
65% 123 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 540
50% 417 Pts
64-Core 720
45% 720 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 12F8) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3640
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.5% Below average
Lighting 31.9
Reflection 60.4
Parallax 27.8
26% 40 fps
MRender 40.8
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 61
45% 54.1 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN810 SDCPNRY-1T00-1032 1TB
577GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61470000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 786 574 627 692 507 700 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 3,660
Write 1,815
Mixed 2,530
SusWrite 648
479% 2,163 MB/s
4K Read 68
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 66.3
264% 92.5 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 388
DQ Mixed 345
240% 290 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 278%
Great: 581%
Nvme CT2000P3 2TB
763GB free
Firmware: P9CR40A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 556 340 158 77 378 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,767
Write 1,945
Mixed 1,671
SusWrite 269
317% 1,413 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 62.5
169% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 555
DQ Write 414
DQ Mixed 256
253% 408 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 163%
Great: 519%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
64.6% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 23.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 4.1
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17M1 Builds (Compare 890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-17M1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback