Medion D17S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive14.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion D17S  (all builds)
MotherboardMedion D17S
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 20:34
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Memory 2.65
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 104
24% 52.6 Pts
4-Core 97.8
8-Core 167
16% 132 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Device(1B0A 2286) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3179
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.8
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 17.2
15% 17.3 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 15.3
13% 15.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD PHISON 256GB PS3110-S10C
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 117 99 0.4 0.2 0.4 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.7% Very poor
Read 170
Write 155
Mixed 155
SusWrite 52.4
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 4.4
15% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 92%
Samsung MZYTE256HMHP-000L2 256GB
63GB free
Firmware: EXT06L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 67 59 53 59 53 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.6% Very poor
Read 153
Write 148
Mixed 117
SusWrite 71.2
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 6.6
19% 6.27 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170ME68F9F1600 Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 478
8% 478 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical D17S Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Medion D17S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback