Medion D17S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion D17S  (all builds)
MotherboardMedion D17S
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180327
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 20:18
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Memory 17.2
1-Core 60
2-Core 110
32% 62.5 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 178
22% 169 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Device(1B0A 2286) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 5.6
4% 8.8 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9.2
6% 6.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZYTE256HMHP-000L2 256GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT06L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 35 34 35 38 38 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.7% Below average
Read 257
Write 55.8
Mixed 77
SusWrite 38.8
23% 107 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 11.7
39% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 59.3
DQ Mixed 57.9
73% 138 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 93%
SSD PHISON 256GB PS3110-S10C
14GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 218
Write 201
Mixed 196
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 8.3
28% 9.37 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 177
156% 231 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170ME68F9F1600 Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 6
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 2.3
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 342
12% 342 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical D17S Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Medion D17S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback