Lenovo 90H2003PUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90H2003PUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36D5
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 19:39
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 173
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 591
56% 464 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX480
AMD(1002 0C05) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.1
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.5% Average
Lighting 48.8
Reflection 60
Parallax 81.3
40% 63.4 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 61.2
Splatting 44.2
45% 56.1 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Bliksem 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 86 125 80 139 248 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 371
Write 295
Mixed 270
SusWrite 144
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 8.7
68% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 15.7
59% 127 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 82%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
888GB free
Firmware: SPS6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 27 28 26 24 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KYXC0V-MID 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
78.5% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 25.6
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 21.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90H2003PUS Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lenovo 90H2003PUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback