Intel B75

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel B75  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220114
Uptime10.3 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 17:41
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 166
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 457
46% 372 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 14.6
13% 13.1 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 15.5
11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HX256GSSDM2PCIE 256GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103F0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1047
Write 846
Mixed 708
192% 867 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 23.1
119% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 464
DQ Write 394
DQ Mixed 415
315% 425 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 170%
Seagate ST31000524NS 1TB-$54
452GB free
Firmware: 1309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 108 110 109 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 117
Write 119
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 109
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix DX8GDDR3U1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 15.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Builds (Compare 4,854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel B75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback