ADD TO PC
BUILD

Clevo P870TMx-(G)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive	263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Clevo P870TMx-(G) (all builds)
Motherboard	CLEVO P870TMx powered by premamod.com
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190523
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '23 at 08:33
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$191 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Memory 90 1-Core 143 2-Core 281 94% 171 Pts	4-Core 554 8-Core 899 89% 726 Pts	64-Core 1,145 71% 1,145 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 100%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 595 330 329 331 330 329 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	263% Outstanding	Read 2,313 Write 1,467 Mixed 995 SusWrite 374 284% 1,287 MB/s	4K Read 58.5 4K Write 195 4K Mixed 84.6 300% 113 MB/s	DQ Read 978 DQ Write 1,500 DQ Mixed 1,006 827% 1,161 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 263% Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 0GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 491 491 491 489 491 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 485 Mixed 459 SusWrite 488 109% 484 MB/s	4K Read 43.6 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 58.4 201% 71.8 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 363 274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown + + 2x16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 24.9 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 24.5 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 67.3 60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback