HP 700-214

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 700-214  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '23 at 22:37
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 208
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 504
52% 421 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
EVGA(3842 3759) 2GB
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 21.2
Parallax 18.2
17% 20.2 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 17.8
18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 232 244 252 253 244 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 480
Write 259
Mixed 198
SusWrite 243
65% 295 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 29.9
128% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 80
114% 216 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 19.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-214 Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-214

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback