PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z210 CMT Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1587h |
Memory | 9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110812 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 04 '23 at 20:54 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E31270
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
68.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
IRP_SSDPR_S25B_240 240GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 161 102 124 101 101 MB/s
|
53.7%
Above average
|
|||
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
26GB free
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 246 33 88 11 11 MB/s
|
64.8%
Good
|
|||
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
145GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 105 106 106 104 MB/s
|
57.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E31270IntelBench 71%, 3,539 samples | 22x |
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 17x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 5x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $97 |