Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5600U 20,423 User benchmarks, average bench 50% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	Memory 19.7 1-Core 65.8 2-Core 137 37% 74.3 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 46.4 18% 112 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 5036) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5144 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	3.58% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 5.5 3% 4.03 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 5 4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.58% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7UB3Q256G1001 256GB 734 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2240501 SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 128 123 146 147 176 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.9% Average	Read 281 Write 177 Mixed 139 SusWrite 154 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 19.8 4K Mixed 12.2 44% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 115 96% 139 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4B8G1646B-MYK0 Elpida EBJ81UG8EFU0-GN-F 12GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.63 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 323 12% 323 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-5600UIntelBench 50%, 20,423 samples	2x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	2x

SSD
SD7UB3Q256G1001 256GBSandiskBench 81%, 734 samples	1x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $137Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1x

RAM
K4B8G1646B-MYK0 Elpida EBJ81UG8EFU0-GN-F 12GBSamsungBench 39%, 10 samples	1x
K4B8G1646B-MYK0 Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU5-GNL-F 8GBSamsungBench 39%, 4 samples	1x