Sony SVP13213CXS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSony SVP13213CXS  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '23 at 15:20
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 60.3
2-Core 108
49% 79.3 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 126
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Sony(104D 90B6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 3.2
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.67%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 128GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM6401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 402 414 409 428 428 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 1032
Write 425
Mixed 392
SusWrite 415
125% 566 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 28.7
99% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 160
136% 202 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 107%
Great: 131%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF0 500GB
64GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 69 68 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 65.6
Write 71.3
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 68.4
80% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.4% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 12.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SVP13213CXS Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Sony SVP13213CXS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback