Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '23 at 15:14
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 161
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 364
40% 316 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 843E) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.28% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 11.8
8% 10.8 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 12
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.28%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SVP200S37A90G 90GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 65 75 74 75 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 147
Write 83.8
Mixed 108
SusWrite 73.6
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 24.6
90% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 28
DQ Write 76.1
DQ Mixed 29.7
29% 44.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 52%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
459GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 143 140 146 153 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 110
Write 134
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 143
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.2% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 10.5
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $397
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback