Dell OptiPlex 790

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 790
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 790  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130924
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 12 '17 at 21:35
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 178
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 320
44% 325 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 2683) 2GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Lighting 42.7
Reflection 38.4
Parallax 51.4
35% 44.2 fps
MRender 50.3
Gravity 47.9
Splatting 36.2
36% 44.8 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 506
Write 405
Mixed 415
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 29.5
120% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 20
59% 128 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 124%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
499GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 154
Mixed 144
116% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.09
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.19
99% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 91%
Great: 108%
Toshiba MK5065GSX 500GB-$52
336GB free
Firmware: GJ002C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 55
Write 54.3
Mixed 50.4
40% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.28
76% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 42%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
207GB free
Firmware: ML6OA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 70.9
Write 63.2
Mixed 58.4
48% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.29
75% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 73%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183
17GB free
Firmware: CT100-13 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 37.8
Mixed 33.8
26% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.29
73% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 42%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
10GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 99.2
Write 132
Mixed 101
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 0.58
129% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL7-2GBRH Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 04CD F3-10666CL7-2GBRH Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.8% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 11.9
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 790 Builds (Compare 5,342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 790

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback