Asus Z97-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140617
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 03 '23 at 05:07
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 191
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 565
58% 468 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 8753) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.8% Very good
Lighting 88.2
Reflection 87.8
Parallax 82.3
72% 86.1 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 70.2
69% 86.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 372 388 313 188 184 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 413
Mixed 372
SusWrite 280
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 44.3
144% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 349
266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 124%
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62
51GB free
Firmware: 04.06A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 133 134 132 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 132
Write 121
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 133
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.5
325% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 113%
WD VelociRaptor 250GB-$35
95GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 136 134 135 134 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 141
Write 108
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 135
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.4
295% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 111%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 148 148 150 149 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 143
Mixed 93.1
SusWrite 148
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 100%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
593GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 93 92 93 93 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 103
Write 92.1
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 91.7
66% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
3TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 137 138 141 140 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 135
Write 127
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 135
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 88%
StoreJet Transcend 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 102 105 103 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 111
Write 98.7
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 104
125% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
51% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2133 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-DELUXE Builds (Compare 619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus Z97-DELUXE - $650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,623
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback