Intel HM570

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics90.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardIntel HM570  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '23 at 01:13
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 165
2-Core 330
106% 196 Pts
4-Core 660
8-Core 1255
114% 957 Pts
64-Core 1,546
96% 1,546 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 109%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 116
Parallax 108
93% 113 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 107
Splatting 103
86% 105 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB
300GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 333 342 360 359 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 504
Write 361
Mixed 363
SusWrite 283
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 9.5
115% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 15.9
53% 115 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 211%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
35GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 211 204 201 203 195 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 487
Mixed 426
SusWrite 228
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 62.3
212% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 341
257% 345 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
522GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 151 151 151 153 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 185
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 151
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kllisre 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 48.5
MC Write 45.1
MC Mixed 37.4
125% 43.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 27.8
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 118%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HM570 Builds (Compare 864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel HM570

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback