Asrock X99X Killer/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer/3.1  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateJul 02 '23 at 15:20
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 147
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 573
56% 459 Pts
64-Core 664
41% 664 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 104
Parallax 64.3
54% 77.9 fps
MRender 69.2
Gravity 60.9
Splatting 57.7
51% 62.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1368 331 361 329 321 348 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,881
Write 1823
Mixed 1,605
SusWrite 510
326% 1,455 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 44.4
145% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 560
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 501
356% 460 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 171%
Great: 347%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
30GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 171 64 62 64 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 446
Write 442
Mixed 375
SusWrite 138
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 41.8
134% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 347
262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
369GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 336 269 219 193 365 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 440
Write 424
Mixed 282
SusWrite 298
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 33.9
115% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 258
216% 314 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 134%
Drobo 5D 17.5TB
7.5TB free, PID 3444
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 192 195 204 212 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 194
Mixed 96.8
SusWrite 201
231% 173 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 2.3
304% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 93%
Great: 99%
VendorCo ProductCode 8GB
0GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 19.4
Mixed 0.2
7% 9.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 31.8
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $559
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback