Asus P5Q-E

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P5Q-E (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090406
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '23 at 15:01
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Memory 83.8 1-Core 45.1 2-Core 89.3 48% 72.7 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 168 23% 169 Pts	64-Core 172 11% 172 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 809D) CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 23.4 Reflection 28.9 Parallax 33.8 19% 28.7 fps	MRender 28.1 Gravity 24.8 Splatting 26.2 22% 26.4 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Drivexpert HDD0 128GB 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.2569 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 52 53 53 53 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.6% Poor	Read 131 Write 56.1 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 52.1 17% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 22.1 4K Mixed 14.2 49% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 14 DQ Write 25.6 DQ Mixed 15.7 13% 18.4 MB/s

Trekstor DataStation 8 160GB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 141GB free Firmware: P22O SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 61 62 62 61 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	39% Below average	Read 73.5 Write 61.8 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 61.9 44% 60.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 41%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB 13,068 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 232GB free Firmware: 3.AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 93 94 97 95 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 90.9 Write 58.6 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 93.9 53% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 53%
Intenso Speed Line 130GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 107GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 19 17 17 18 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.9% Below average	Read 205 Write 6.3 Mixed 28.6 SusWrite 17.7 55% 64.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1.5 82% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 7.1 22% 7.63 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 7.2 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q-E Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-E

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	55x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	18x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	16x

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	14x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	7x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Q300 120GBToshibaBench 70%, 1,888 samples	7x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	6x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	129x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	24x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16