Microelectronics G439

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicroelectronics G439  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4(MS-7D25)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '23 at 06:49
Run Duration96 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700KF-$189
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 204
2-Core 409
120% 232 Pts
4-Core 810
8-Core 1,564
141% 1,187 Pts
64-Core 2,347
145% 2,347 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 117%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
PNY(196E 13AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 535.98
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (124 fps cap detected)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 124
Parallax 124
101% 124 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 124
Splatting 124
102% 124 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 101%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,054
Write 2,250
Mixed 1,946
466% 2083 MB/s
4K Read 65.4
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 92.1
326% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,668
DQ Write 1,381
DQ Mixed 1,428
1,096% 1,492 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 300%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
63GB free
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2064
Write 2,110
Mixed 1,779
443% 1,985 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 82
295% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,457
DQ Write 1,478
DQ Mixed 1,092
924% 1,342 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 271%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVKS 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 31.3
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 25.6
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G439 Builds (Compare 585 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 197%
UFO

System: Microelectronics G439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $668
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback