Microelectronics G439

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics365% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicroelectronics G439  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4(MS-7D25)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '23 at 23:13
Run Duration96 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700KF-$189
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 78.7
1-Core 204
2-Core 411
119% 231 Pts
4-Core 812
8-Core 1,501
138% 1,156 Pts
64-Core 2,314
143% 2,314 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 115%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
PNY(196E 13AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
365% Outstanding
Lighting 579
Reflection 543
Parallax 644
472% 589 fps
MRender 506
Gravity 556
Splatting 285
351% 449 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 365%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,102
Write 2,335
Mixed 2,071
486% 2,170 MB/s
4K Read 66.4
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 90.6
317% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,591
DQ Write 1,338
DQ Mixed 1,393
1,063% 1,441 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 300%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
81GB free
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,079
Write 2,053
Mixed 1,710
435% 1,948 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 211
4K Mixed 84.8
313% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,464
DQ Write 1,476
DQ Mixed 1,094
926% 1,345 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 271%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVKS 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 31.7
94% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 25.2
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G439 Builds (Compare 584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 197%
UFO

System: Microelectronics G439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $668
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback