Asus PRO A320M-R WI-FI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRO A320M-R WI-FI  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '23 at 23:41
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$166
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 81
1-Core 171
2-Core 322
102% 191 Pts
4-Core 623
8-Core 1,068
102% 845 Pts
64-Core 1,293
80% 1,293 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Lighting 88.2
Reflection 134
Parallax 169
72% 130 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 89.6
Splatting 155
120% 146 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Verico SSD 240GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 416 424 427 395 401 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 478
Write 387
Mixed 326
SusWrite 411
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 22.1
112% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 95.4
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 30.6
75% 149 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 146 147 147 150 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 150
Write 149
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 147
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
93% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 85%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 30.8
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 33.3
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRO A320M-R WI-FI Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRO A320M-R WI-FI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $445
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback