Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 01 '23 at 21:46
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 76
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 123
56% 90.5 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 232
30% 228 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.1% Poor
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 28.5
30% 35.1 fps
MRender 32.5
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 24.6
25% 31.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 251 265 268 255 283 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 470
Write 438
Mixed 427
SusWrite 260
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 44.2
139% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 85.4
90% 155 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 87%
Great: 129%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
31GB free
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 263 213 219 217 218 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 463
Write 413
Mixed 305
SusWrite 239
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 33.7
115% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 224
175% 242 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 101%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
461GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 145 141 152 154 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 141
Mixed 95.9
SusWrite 149
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
245GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 89 94 92 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 72.1
Write 67.9
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 92.2
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 68%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
5GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 50 45 29 24 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 115
Write 66.3
Mixed 75
SusWrite 34.8
90% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
54% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/4G 99P5474-022.A00LF 99P5474-022.A00LF 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.1% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11.4
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback