LG A75CV.ATG321

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG A75CV.ATG321  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR MS-7886
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '23 at 08:59
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 182
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 452
48% 384 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.2% Very good
Lighting 87.6
Reflection 89.5
Parallax 82.3
71% 86.5 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 76
Splatting 70.9
68% 85 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aitc KSM 512GB SSD
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220115
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 10 9.4 200 11 11 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.6% Good
Read 239
Write 236
Mixed 244
SusWrite 50.6
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 36.6
129% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 178
134% 180 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 1315 BLS4G3D18ADS3.16FE 12GB
1867, 1867 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.7% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.2
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 7.5
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A75CV.ATG321 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: LG A75CV.ATG321

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback