User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics96.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8 GAMING
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '23 at 08:22
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 176
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 609
56% 468 Pts
64-Core 1,361
84% 1,361 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Asus(1043 05AD) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.2.1
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.1% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 138
Parallax 197
97% 151 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 139
Splatting 94.4
94% 117 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
536GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1370 1454 1206 364 424 198 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,316
Write 1,617
Mixed 1,463
SusWrite 836
295% 1,308 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 47.8
154% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 393
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 307
228% 307 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 165%
Great: 365%
Adata SU750 256GB
39GB free
Firmware: XA001R29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 397 401 408 411 410 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 408
Mixed 384
SusWrite 402
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 39.2
128% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 271
206% 278 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40EB1-CRC M393A2G40DB1-CRC M393A2G40DB1-CRC M393A2G40EB1-CRC 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
MC Read 46.2
MC Write 44.5
MC Mixed 36
121% 42.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback