Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

11 months ago, 11 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6200U 135,462 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	39.2% Below average	Memory 48.5 1-Core 66.1 2-Core 133 46% 82.5 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 168 23% 172 Pts	64-Core 173 11% 173 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 5048) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6168 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	5.16% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 5.9 5% 5.03 fps	MRender 6.6 Gravity 5.9 Splatting 9.3 6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.16% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 76 41 39 35 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Read 306 Write 266 Mixed 294 SusWrite 81.8 53% 237 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 0.6 23% 6.53 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 0467 RMT3170MP68F9F1600 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.7% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 11 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 8.2 24% 8.43 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	39x
Radeon R7 M370AMDBench 7%, 196 samples	1x
Radeon R7 M370AMDBench 7%, 300 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LF192HCGS-000L1 192GBSamsungBench 50%, 1,857 samples	4x
MZ7TY256HDHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 85%, 4,113 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 10,651 samples	7x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	6x
CT102464BF160B.M16 2x8GBCrucialBench 51%, 9,135 samples	3x