Asus H61M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H61M-A  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140624
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 01 '23 at 02:11
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
28.8% Poor
Memory 37.6
1-Core 34.4
2-Core 56.4
27% 42.8 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 128
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Gigabyte(1458 4076) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 155
Parallax 162
132% 160 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 125
Splatting 108
106% 132 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 119%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 115 118 111 128 129 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.4% Poor
Read 39.4
Write 68.9
Mixed 98.7
SusWrite 115
18% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 6.9
28% 9.53 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 116
96% 135 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 88%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 99 97 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 105
Write 101
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 98.9
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 01BA 8GBH2X04E99927-15 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
26.1% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 8.3
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 214
19% 214 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-A Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback