HP ProBook x360 435 G7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemHP ProBook x360 435 G7  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8735
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '23 at 16:28
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Eng Sample: 100-000000083-40_38/18_Y
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.4% Very good
Memory 68.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 261
82% 154 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 685
74% 586 Pts
64-Core 682
42% 682 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 8735) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 14.6
Parallax 21.6
12% 17.2 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 17.5
Splatting 15.8
13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKKF128G8H 128GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 139 137 139 138 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,084
Write 618
Mixed 569
SusWrite 148
134% 605 MB/s
4K Read 65.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 79.9
260% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 404
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 290
242% 349 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 151%
Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3310MB96HAF-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 27.2
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 19.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook x360 435 G7 Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook x360 435 G7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback